|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Massachusetts - June 22 - June 23, 2007
|
| |
Kelliher v. Hanover Ins. Co., Opinion No.: 99188, Docket Number: 2004-01050,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT HAMPDEN, June 22, 2007, Decided, June 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because plaintiff was a member of her mother's household, whose UM policy named her as an operator but not as an insured, under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 175, § 113L(5), she could make a claim for UIM coverage only from her mother's policy, not under the policy that covered the car in which plaintiff had been a passenger.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Renaissance Dev. Corp. v. Granger, Opinion No.: 98829, Docket Number: 2006-2041A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT WORCESTER, June 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the filing of the appeal was the only action that the new restaurant operator labeled as wrongful, the abutting restaurant met its initial burden pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 59H. In contrast, the new restaurant operator had not met its burden. Thus, the motion to dismiss the counterclaims was allowed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|