|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Massachusetts - July 28 - July 31, 2007
|
| |
Fontanills v. Barron & Stadfeld, P.C., Opinion No.: 99100, Docket Number: 06-CV-4409-F,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, July 28, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a corporation's discovery requests were wide-ranging, on their face sought documents protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege as well as work product, or were otherwise insulated by specific court or arbitration order, the motion to compel was denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commonwealth v. Vazquez, No. 05-P-956,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, July 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's motion for a finding of not guilty on charges of conspiracy, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 274, § 7, as the Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence to show that defendant, a correction officer, smuggled contraband into a correctional facility in exchange for the use of defendant's automobile.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commerce Ins. Co. v. Collins, Opinion No.: 99185, Docket Number: 06-2014,
SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, AT MIDDLESEX, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a motor vehicle accident case, an insurer's motion for summary judgment was allowed because the personal injury claimant involved in the accident could not carry the burden of proof on coverage where the wife, the registered owner of a truck, did not give the husband, the unlicensed driver involved in the accident, permission to drive the truck.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|