|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Massachusetts - September 12 - September 18, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cent. Ceilings, Inc. v. Nat'l Amusements, Inc., No. 06-P-291,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, September 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A project owner's oral promise to pay a subcontractor a general contractor's debt to the subcontractor was enforceable, under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 259, § 1, Second, because, under the statute's "main purpose" exception, the promise was made to secure the subcontractor's expedited performance and paying the general contractor's debt was incidental.
|
|
| |
|
| |
DePiero v. Burke, No. 06-P-401,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, September 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant property owners were entitled to dismissal under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 59H, the anti-SLAPP statute, of plaintiff property owner's abuse of process action as defendants' zoning appeal, although unsuccessful, had factual and legal support as an ordinance required 125 feet of frontage and only 20 feet of frontage was actually available.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|