 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lima v. Marshall, No. 06-P-826,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, October 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants were entitled to summary judgment in a negligence action where the injured party failed to meet the burden under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, § 6D, of showing which treatment after a second accident represented a bona fide effort to alleviate or ameliorate the whiplash resulting from accident the first accident involving defendants.
|
|||||
| N. Am. Expositions Co. L.P. v. Corcoran, No. 06-P-440,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, October 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Gate show producer sued convention center and its representative because the latter tried to persuade a charitable foundation to deny the producer access to exposition center. As foundation was not legislative body or public forum, and representative's statements were commercially motivated, dismissal of suit under the anti-SLAPP statute was error.
|
|||||
| Olsen v. Teachers' Ret. Bd., No. 06-P-1619.,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, October 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a stipend paid to teachers amounted to "regular compensation," as defined by Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 32, § 1, and not a bonus, and had to be understood to encompass all other forms of recurring payments for an employee's services, so long as the payments comported with the statute, the teachers were properly granted judgment on the pleadings.
|
|||||
| Tatar v. Schuker, No. 06-P-1312.,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, October 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a support order was unclear as to whether a father's support obligation terminated upon emancipation, a father could not be held in contempt based on his failure to pay. But, he was properly denied an evidentiary hearing in the three proceedings, he was not entitled to a credit, an attorney-fee award was justified, and recusal was unwarranted.
|
|||||
| Homesavers Council of Greenfield Gardens, Inc. v. Sanchez, No. 06 P 1180.,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, October 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tenant was allowed damages for interference with right of quiet enjoyment under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 186, § 14; Housing Choice Voucher subsidy was wrongfully terminated and tenant subjected to eviction proceedings for not paying unlawfully computed rent, causing severe emotional distress, compensable as reasonably foreseeable consequential damages.
|
|||||
| Commonwealth v. Antonmarchi, No. 06-P-1106.,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, October 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pavian v. Hickey, No. 06-P-227.,
APPEALS COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, October 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
