Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Michigan - January 16, 2007
	ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, No. 263972, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	BEDI v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, No. 271121, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	BRISTOL WEST INS. CO. v. GONZALEZ, No. 270527, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	CRUMP v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO., No. 263406, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Credit Acceptance Corp. v. 46th Dist. Court, No. 262404, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Mandatory language of MCR 3.101(D) did not allow a trial court to require that a judgment creditor provide information or documentation in addition to the verified statement required before issuing a writ of garnishment; the rules provided a procedure assuring that the debtor was served with the writ so that the debtor could file objections. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	DOT v. P & S TRANSP., INC., No. 262506, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	FRISCH v. STATE FARM FIRE & CAS. CO., No. 263939, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	FULTON v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO., No. 270644, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	GARRISON v. DINNERWARE PLUS HOLDINGS, No. 271112, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	GREAT LAKES TOWING CO. v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, No. 271556, COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 16, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.