 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PEOPLE v. GILMER, No. 257268,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. MILLER, No. 257929,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. ROOT, No. 251532,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Boulding, No. 256836,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Hill, No. 264361,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly charged with child pornography under § 750.145c(2) where evidence showed that defendant downloaded child pornography from websites and compiled the images onto CD-Rs because language of § 750.145c(2) was unambiguous and defendant was aware that he was creating pornographic CD-Rs.
|
|||||
| People v. Irwin, No. 257405,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. McGinn, No. 256407,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Melton, No. 257036,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentencing court erroneously assigned 10 points for offense variable (OV) 9 pursuant to Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.39 despite the fact victims had not been placed in danger and court also scored OV 16 regarding value of the stolen property; sentencing court's "double dip" raised defendant's OV level and placed her in OV level III instead of level II.
|
|||||
| People v. Ross, No. 258028,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
