 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kloberdanz v. Swan Valley Sch. Dist., No. 256208,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| MEAGHER v. LAFONTAINE, No. 256138,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| MORGAN v. PLACE, No. 256596,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Meklir v. Feldman, SC: 129296,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mullins v. St. Joseph Mercy Hosp., No. 263210,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mich. Comp. Laws. § 600.5856 only tolled statutes of limitation or repose and Mich. Comp. Laws. § 600.5852 was not a statute of limitation, but a saving statute; therefore, a complaint filed outside of the time periods in the saving statute was untimely, regardless of whether the plaintiff tolled the statute of limitations with a notice of intent.
|
|||||
| Mun. Emples. Ret. Sys. v. Charter Twp. of Delta, SC: 129041,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Niswonger v. Quality Dairy Co., SC: 129314,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Oliver v. Smith, No. 254654,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied the police officer's motion for summary disposition under Mich. Ct. R. 2.116(C)(10) in the citizen's excessive force lawsuit because while the citizen did not present evidence to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the officer's conduct was grossly negligent, discovery had not yet been completed.
|
|||||
| PEOPLE, No. 258335,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
