 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dhue v. Kasle Steel Corp., SC: 131488,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Duncan v. Atty. Griev. Comm'n, SC: 132462,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ERWAY v. ERWAY, No. 265194,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Egeler v. Wylie, SC: 132486, 132487,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| El Paso Prod. Oil & Gas Co. v. Private Bus., Inc., SC: 132555,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Elliott v. Atty. Griev. Comm'n, SC: 132461,
SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Eyre v. Saginaw Corr. Facility, No. 261348,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in upholding a determination that claimant was not entitled to unemployment benefits on ground that she had refused suitable offer of work without good cause because burden of proof was improperly placed on claimant to establish both that position offered was unsuitable or, if it was suitable, that she had good cause to refuse it.
|
|||||
| Fieger v. Cox, No. 266264, No. 267309,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to MCR 3.302(D)(2), a circuit court erred in not dismissing the individuals' original actions seeking writs of mandamus and superintending control orders over the district court's decisions to issue subpoenas. The circuit court violated Const. 1963, art. 3, § 2, in thwarting the Attorney General's campaign finance investigation.
|
|||||
| Flanagan v. Comau Pico, No. 272305,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a former employee alleged that the employer breached an agreement by terminating him, remand was necessary because LMRA § 301 governed the preempted claim since the claim required interpretation of a CBA, defendants could not waive the application of § 301, and the trial court had concurrent jurisdiction over the § 301 claim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
