 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Borgersen v. Cardiovascular Sys., A06-710,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former employee could not maintain a claim under Minnesota's whistleblower statute, Minn. Stat. § 181.932, subd. 1(a) (2004), because statements to his supervisors regarding his concerns about the test failures for a certain medical device did not constitute a "report" since he did not communicate a violation or a suspected violation of any law.
|
|||||
| Dunn v. Nat'l Bev. Corp., A06-396, A06-397,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found the beverage corporation was party to 1972 franchise agreement as part of its 1999 asset purchase of another company. Jury could conclude that breach of contract occurred against the distributor. Denial of distributor's attorney fees under Minn. Stat. § 80C.17, subd. 3 was proper as breach did not implicate franchise act.
|
|||||
| Garcia v. Alstom Signaling, Inc., A06-660,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an unemployment benefits matter, ALJ erred in determining that severance payments employee received after being furloughed constituted payments that delayed unemployment benefits under Minn. Stat. § 268.085, subd. 3 because employee did not receive or have entitlement to severance pay at the same time he was collecting unemployment benefits.
|
|||||
| In re Child of Evenson, A06-1217,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because mother's presumption of parental fitness was overcome when district court transferred custody from her, and mother failed to offer a convincing argument demonstrating when and how she regained the presumption, district court's decision placing child in permanent custody of his maternal grandfather and step-grandmother was affirmed.
|
|||||
| In re Claim for Benefits by Sloan, A06-531,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the officer's injury resulted from a reasonable exercise of professional judgment, which was legitimately calculated to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public, the benefits panel erred in denying the officer's application for continued employer-provided health-insurance benefits under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465.
|
|||||
| Wichmann v. Travalia & U.S. Directives, Inc., A06-677,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of unemployment benefits was remanded because an unemployment law judge failed to make any findings regarding the credibility of the witnesses, as required by Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subdiv. 1(c) (Supp. 2005), despite the fact that the decision that the former employer discharged the employee for misconduct relied on credibility assessments.
|
|||||
| Francis v. State, A05-190 and A06-940,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, April 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction for first-degree premeditated murder, Minn. Stat. § 609.185, because there was eyewitness testimony, and records indicated that calls placed from defendant's cell phone shortly before the murder were processed through a tower located within the general area of the shooting.
|
|||||
| State v. Kuhlman, A06-568,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, April 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted a driver's motion to dismiss his citation for failing to stop a red light based on Minneapolis, Minn., Code art. I, §§ 474.620 to 474.670, which authorized photo enforcement of traffic control signals, as the ordinances conflicted with the Minnesota Traffic Regulations, Minn. Stat. ch. 169 (2006) and were thus invalid.
|
|||||
| State v. Turnage, A06-1124,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, April 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant murder convict was properly denied postconviction relief after the recantation of his brother's testimony as he did not satisfy his burden per Minn. Stat. § 590.04, subd. 3; without it, the jury still would have heard an eyewitness account that appellant stabbed the victim multiple times and inconsistencies would have been eliminated.
|
|||||
| Curiskis v. City of Minneapolis, A06-982,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given that Minneapolis, Minn., City Charter ch. 10. § 8 required disclosure of the special assessment appeals process to affected property owners, and the language in § 8 was what appeared in notices, the owner reasonably assumed he had a total of 40 days to file his appeal. Consequently, the owner timely filed and the district court was reversed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
