 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. McArthur, A06-853,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported appellant's conviction of first-degree, premeditated murder under Minn. Stat. § 609.185 because, while no evidence of motive was introduced, and the murder was the only indication that appellant and the victim were acquainted, there was evidence of planning activity or premeditation as defined in Minn. Stat. § 609.18.
|
|||||
| Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Perry, A06-1235,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the live-in significant other of an insured did not meet the definition of "dependent" under the insured's automobile insurance policy or under Minnesota's No-Fault Act, Minn. Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 6, she was ineligible to receive survivor's economic loss benefits from the insurer upon the death of the insured in an automobile accident.
|
|||||
| In re Benefits by Hagert, A06-1141,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Benefit eligibility panel erred in finding that retired officer was ineligible to receive continued health-insurance benefits because, while Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 required occupational duties/responsibilities to put officer at risk for type of injury sustained, it did not require the duties/responsibilities to be unique to those of peace officer.
|
|||||
| In re Welfare of Children of M.L.A., A06-2018,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the district court failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant mother's admission was coerced, the court reversed the district court's denial of the mother's motion to withdraw her admission, vacated the judgment terminating her parental rights, and remanded for an evidentiary hearing on that issue.
|
|||||
| State v. Richmond, A06-2092,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecuting the sale of 0.2 grams of cocaine as a third-degree crime under Minn. Stat. § 152.023, subd. 1(1) did not violate Fourteenth Amendment equal-protection principles, because, inter alia, the legislature intended the sale of less than three grams of cocaine to constitute a third-degree rather than a fourth-degree controlled-substance crime.
|
|||||
| State v. Crow, A06-229,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, April 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Double Jeopardy Clause was not violated when jury returned guilty verdict on a lesser offense, failing to return a signed form on a greater offense, but following further instruction, returned a guilty verdict on the greater offense because verdicts were not final until jury returned all forms, verdicts were read in open court, and jury was polled.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
