 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., P.L.L.P., A05-340, A05-1952,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, May 31, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of an action alleging, inter alia, accounting malpractice was affirmed where the interrogatory answers by a company and its owner did not meet the minimum standard for an affidavit of expert disclosure as specified in Minn. Stat. § 544.42, subds. 2(2) and (4). The reversal of the dismissal of a second complaint was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Granville v. Minneapolis Pub. Sch., A05-1377, A05-1378,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, May 31, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Minn. Stat. § 466.12 did not provide school district tort immunity because statute expired in 1974 and was not revived. Repeal of expiration provision, § 466.12, subd. 4, did not revive statute given presumption of that legislature knew of Minn. Stat. § 645.36 and implication that repealing lapsed expiration provision did not revive underlying law.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
