 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., P.L.L.P., A05-1952,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a district court erred by dismissing appellants' second lawsuit absent a final judgment on the merits in the first lawsuit and because the court declined to adopt a prohibition against claim splitting as an affirmative defense separate and independent from res judicata, the court reversed the judgment dismissing appellants' second lawsuit.
|
|||||
| In re M.R.H., A05-929,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because victim's parents were not parties to settlement agreement between victim, juvenile, and juvenile's parents, restitution award was not duplicative. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 611A.04, subd. 1, district court did not know extent of family's loss at sentencing, and restitution could be ordered for father's use of his accrued employment leave.
|
|||||
| McClure v. Davis Eng'g, L.L.C., A05-1285,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was improperly granted to a manufacturer in a case involving a dispute over unpaid commissions because a corporation was properly characterized as a "commission salesperson" under Minn. Stat. § 181.145 since the definition of "person" under Minn. Stat. § 654.44, subd. 1 applied where no contrary intention was expressed.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Guth v. Fabian, A05-1554,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in denying petitioner habeas corpus relief where Minn. Stat. § 244.171, subd. 4 (2004) did not provide that the time that petitioner served in phase I of the challenge incarceration program should be excluded from the calculation of his term of imprisonment after he was removed from the program for absconding.
|
|||||
| Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc., A04-1691,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of wrongful discharge action claiming violation of public policy against the nonprofit corporation was affirmed because the employee pointed to no clear public policy that supported a cause of action for employees who were discharged in retaliation for exercising their voting rights as nonprofit members.
|
|||||
| Stiles v. State, A05-2081,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Postconviction court did not err in denying petitioner's second request for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing because under Minn. Stat. § 509.04, subd. 3, the postconviction court could summarily deny a petition when the issues raised in it had previously been decided by the supreme court in the same case.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
