LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Minnesota - June 12, 2007

  
Bosch v. Weinstock, A06-1171, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly denied a former husband's motion to vacate an order modifying the husband's parenting time because the husband was properly served by registered mail in the Philippines under Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.04(c)(2) and the notice of motion was mailed 21 days before the hearing, which complied with Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 303.03(a)(1).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cedar Fair v. Minntertainment Co., A06-1405, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: From an arbitration between the owners and manager of an amusement park when the owners terminated the management agreement, the trial court properly denied the owners' motion to vacate the arbitration award under Minn. Stat. § 572.19 as they failed to prove that the manager's conduct constituted a breach of the management agreement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Christiansen v. Univ. of Minn. Bd. of Regents, A06-1796, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court properly denied a social host's motion to dismiss as untimely an action under Minn. Stat. § 340A.90 (2004). Because the host's liability in serving alcohol to a minor guest who died was created by Minn. Stat. § 340A.90 (2004), the appropriate limitation period was six years under Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(2).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Daniels v. Welch, A06-1335, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where respondent testified that she was holding her child when appellant shoved her while yelling obscenities at her, the district court had sufficient evidence to issue an order for protection under Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 6(a)(1). The district court did not commit reversible error by admitting evidence of a separate kicking incident.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Emmons v. Rivers Hotel Co., A06-1368, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Unemployment law judge properly found that an employee was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits as ringing up sales under other employees' identification numbers at bar in the hotel (the employer) violated the employer's established procedures and constituted employment misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 268.095, subd. 6(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fisher v. State, A06-76, A06-77, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where there was an alleged pattern of threats and assaults, and appellants knew that prison gangs posed a substantial risk to the inmate's safety and allegedly did not act, because appellants did not reasonably respond to the inmate's basic safety needs, they were not immune to the inmate's Eighth Amendment claims in their individual capacities.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Humphrey v. Humphrey, A06-934, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Spousal maintenance award to a wife and equal property division under Minn. Stat. §§ 518.552 and 518.58 were upheld because, inter alia, the husband's fluctuating income was properly averaged and although the wife contributed significant nonmarital funds to the acquisition of the parties' various homes, these amounts were repaid with interest.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Children of D.L.T., A06-2229, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The termination of a mother's parental rights was proper under Minn. Stat. § 260C.301, subd. 1(b)(2) because the mother failed to comply with duties imposed by the parent-child relationship since she continually failed to apply basic parenting skills such as tending to the dietary and hygienic needs of her children.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Civ. Commitment of Woltjer, A06-2355, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Clear and convincing evidence supported a court's determination that a patient engaged in a course of harmful sexual conduct under Minn. Stat. § 253B.02 because he conceded that his conviction for sexually abusing a six-year-old girl constituted harmful sexual conduct, and another victim testified that the sexual assault was painful.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kampf v. Kampf, A06-799, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a marital dissolution proceeding, district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding a wife spousal maintenance. pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 518.552, because the district court properly included savings and retirement savings in the award. Similarly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by applying the marginal tax rates.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.