LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Minnesota - June 28 - June 29, 2006

  
In re GlaxoSmithKline PLC, A04-2150, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 28, 2006, Decided , June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Amundson, A04-2072, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 28, 2006, Decided , June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Burmayer, A05-1482, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 28, 2006, Decided , June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Cannady, A05-811, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 28, 2006, Decided , June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Osborne, A05-988, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 28, 2006, Decided , June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wilson v. State, A05-677, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 28, 2006, Decided , June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Wood, A05-389, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The indefinite suspension of the attorney from the practice of law was proper because he borrowed money from a client without advising the client to seek independent counsel; failed diligently in his representation of two clients; failed to cooperate with the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility; and failed to repay a loan.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. DeRosier, A03-1718, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Reversal and remand for resentencing of defendant's 144-month sentence for criminal sexual conduct in the first degree was affirmed because the district court's independent determination of the date of defendant's offense was a violation of the U.S. Supreme Court Blakely decision.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Johnson, A04-385, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court erred by denying defendant's request for instruction on lesser-included offense of first-degree heat of passion manslaughter because jury could determine that defendant engaged in increasingly heated argument with girlfriend that escalated into physical altercation in which girlfriend shot defendant, provoking defendant to shoot her back.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., A04-1251, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Contractor's contribution and indemnity claims against subcontractors and supplier were properly dismissed by district court where repose provision of Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a), barred claim that had not accrued and had not been brought within 10 years from completion of construction; statute did not violate Minn. Stat. Const. art. 1, § 8.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.