Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Minnesota - June 14, 2007
	In re Estate of Kinney, A05-1794, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 14, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A grant of summary judgment in favor of the decedent's second wife finding that the antenuptial agreement between the two was invalid was improper because the opportunity to consult with independent counsel about an antenuptial agreement was not required for the antenuptial agreement to have been enforceable. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Anderson, A05-1167, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 14, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: District court did not err by applying the firearm prohibition statute, Minn. Stat. § 609.165, subd. 1b(a), to defendant, even though his prior felony burglary conviction was subsequently deemed to be a misdemeanor under Minn. Stat. § 609.13, because he was convicted of a crime of violence as defined in Minn. Stat. § 624.712. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Maurstad, A04-1000, SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, June 14, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: District court erred in assigning defendant a custody status point under Minn. Sentencing Guidelines II.B.2.c. because his current offenses were not committed within probationary term for prior conviction, as he was placed on probation for a period not to exceed the statutory maximum of 10 years, and he was discharged from probation. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.