|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Minnesota - June 26, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Ehlen v. Ehlen, A06-798,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where marital assets were divided equally, the property division under Minn. Stat. § 518.58, subd. 1 was upheld because, inter alia, the record supported the findings about the date of separation and the wife's continued contribution to the acquisition of assets, and the district court specifically addressed taxes in its detailed findings.
|
|
| |
Ellis v. City of Minneapolis, A06-1063,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court of appeals granted building owner's motion to strike city's document titled "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Recommendations" from record and held absent that document, record did not permit meaningful review of whether demolition decision complied with procedures required by, inter alia, Minneapolis, Minn., Code Ordinances § 249.50(b).
|
|
| |
Glass Serv. Co. v. Ill. Farmers Ins. Co., A06-1074,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, June 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 65B.525, subd. 1 of the No Fault Act, arbitrators had not exceeded their authority in issuing awards in consolidated cases as although aggregate amount of awards exceeded $ 10,000 jurisdictional limit, each of the 5,700 individual claims made against an automobile insurer by an auto glass repair company was under $ 10,000.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|