 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dukes v. State, A05-2264,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Postconviction court did not abuse its discretion in denying inmate's petition for relief where inmate alleged that admission of a codefendant's statements made at codefendant's guilty plea hearing violated inmate's right to confrontation because inmate's case was final when Crawford and no exception to Teague applied.
|
|||||
| State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Aquila, A04-1816,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because installation of a natural gas pipeline system in a hazardous location was an improvement to real property for purpose of applying 10-year statute of repose in Minn. Stat. § 541.051, insurers' claims against a pipeline company and a company that installed pipeline for damages that were caused by a natural gas leak were barred by § 541.051.
|
|||||
| State v. Bourke, A04-1121,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine case, because the State met its burden of showing that there was at least a reasonable suspicion that a nighttime search of defendant's property was necessary under Minn. Stat. § 626.14 to preserve evidence, denial of defendant's motion to suppress was proper.
|
|||||
| State v. Cram, CX-02-1178 and A05-1379,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a domestic abuse murder case, exclusion of a priest's testimony was proper as defendant provided no basis to override the statutory privilege under Wis. Stat. § 595.02, subd. 1(c), and defendant did not explain how the priest's testimony about one conversation the priest had with the victim nine months before the murder would have been relevant.
|
|||||
| State v. Medal-Mendoza, A05-1084,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's convictions of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder because, in part, the district court did not commit prejudicial error when it did not allow him to present evidence of his codefendants' gang affiliation and when it allowed a police officer to testify as an expert regarding "triangulation" evidence.
|
|||||
| Travelers Indem. Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co., A04-1713,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A grant of summary judgment in favor of the corporation's insurer in the insurer's declaratory judgment action was inappropriate because nothing in the policies issued by the insurer to the corporation, its insured, required that the shareholder's knowledge of his own history of violence be imputed to the corporation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
