 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cargill Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms, A05-2287,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a breach of contract case, a buyer failed to show that a sales contract was formed under Minn. Stat. § 336.2-204(1) because there was no evidence that a seller accepted an oral or written contract to sell a large quantity of corn; the seller's silence was insufficient to show acceptance based on the course of dealings between the parties.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Fresenius Med. Care, Inc., A05-1887,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in giving the employee handbook provision legal effect because under Minn. Stat. § 181.13(a), compensation for accrued vacation time actually earned and unpaid at the time the employee was discharged had to be paid in the same manner as other wages and commissions.
|
|||||
| Peterson v. Johnson, A05-1450,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed a trial court's determination that Minn. Stat. § 541.03 applied to a document that on its face was an absolute conveyance and declared it to be an equitable mortgage because no evidence existed that it was anything but an equitable mortgage.
|
|||||
| Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. Jones, A05-2083,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an eviction case, the fact that two owners raised a title question under Minn. Stat. § 504B.121 did not deprive a district court of subject matter jurisdiction to address an eviction proceeding; moreover, the appeal was not moot since the owners vacated the property only to avoid imminent enforcement of an eviction judgment.
|
|||||
| State v. Polsfuss, A05-2108, A05-2563,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: DWI convictions were affirmed because defendants had not shown that they were coerced into submitting to the chemical tests and had not shown how their due-process rights had been violated, and the advisory did not mislead defendants into involuntarily consenting to taking a chemical test.
|
|||||
| State v. Ritter, A05-770,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Refusal to allow questioning as to pro-law enforcement bias during voir dire deprived defendant of his right to an impartial jury, because the only witnesses were defendant and four law enforcement personnel, and a limitation on discovery of possible bias toward law enforcement went to a jurors' ability to impartially weigh the evidence.
|
|||||
| State v. Ulmer, A05-1148,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction of interference with privacy in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.746, subd. 1(c), was affirmed because the seven-year-old victim had an expectation of privacy when using a partitioned urinal in a public restroom, and the space above the partition constituted an aperture within the meaning of the statute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
