 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Scurry, A06-1065,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, July 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In appellant's trial for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, the district court properly excluded evidence of the victim's allegation of earlier sexual abuse by a person other than appellant because it qualified as sexual conduct for purposes of applying the rape-shield statute, Minn. Stat. § 609.347, and neither statutory exception applied.
|
|||||
| State v. Vonderharr, A06-2421,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, July 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's order requiring the state to produce a records custodian to provide foundation for admitting Department of Public Safety (DPS) records was reversed and remanded; because the DPS records were not prepared for the purpose of prosecuting the driver, they were not testimonial evidence that implicated the Confrontation Clause.
|
|||||
| State v. Walker, A06-522,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, July 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's second-degree assault conviction was reversed as the trial court's decision to allow him to be impeached by a prior second-degree assault conviction under Minn. R. Evid. 609 reasonably discouraged defendant from testifying, and there was a reasonable possibility that the ruling affected the outcome of the trial.
|
|||||
| State v. Weaver, A06-551,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, July 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for second-degree unintentional felony murder in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.19, subd. 2(1) was improper because laboratory test results were testimonial and defendant had no opportunity to cross-examine the laboratory technician, whose identity was unknown. Thus, it was in error to allow testimony regarding the results.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
