 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Antone v. Mirviss, A04-1367,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A grant of summary judgment in favor of the attorney in the client's legal malpractice action was proper pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1 because the client suffered some damage on December 21, 1986, when he and his former wife entered into their marriage and that date was more than six years before the commencement of the current action.
|
|||||
| In re Reinstatement of Ramirez, A04-2499,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court concluded that a disbarred attorney was entitled to be conditionally reinstated to the practice of law, as permitted by Minn. R. Law. Prof. Resp. 18, because the attorney proven by clear and convincing evidence that she had undergone a moral change such that clients could have complete confidence in her competence and morality.
|
|||||
| State v. Wright, A05-1747,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a murder case, evidence of defendant's prior assault conviction was properly admitted, Minn. R. Evid. 404(b), because both incidents involved intrusions into homes of vulnerable victims whom defendant had known for some time, both occurred in the early morning, and the weapon used and injuries inflicted in both incidents were markedly similar.
|
|||||
| Lorix v. Crompton Corp., A05-2148,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Minnesota Antitrust Act indirect-purchaser standing was limited to participants in market restrained by alleged antitrust violation, court did not err in dismissing tire purchaser's suit against rubber-processing-chemical companies; "indirectly" injured in Minn. Stat. § 325D.57 did not apply to her claims so purchaser did not have standing.
|
|||||
| Zander v. Zander, A05-2094,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in holding that monthly payments that wife, a tribal member, received from the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community fell within the definition of "income" in Minn. Stat. § 518.54, subd. 6 (2004); therefore, any such payments received by her during marriage were marital property subject to division upon dissolution.
|
|||||
| State v. Greer, A05-552,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, August 23, 2006, Decided , August 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
