 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Spears v. State, A05-319,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, December 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's Apprendi claims had substantive merit and his failure to raise them on direct appeal was not deliberate or inexcusable, Minnesota Court of Appeals erred in determining that Apprendi claims were procedurally barred; his sentence violated due process as the maximum sentence was 30 years in prison and he was sentenced to 40 years.
|
|||||
| State v. Dobbins, A05-320,
SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, December 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's peremptory challenge of only African-American venireperson was not racially discriminatory under Minn. R. Crim. P. 26.02, subd. 6a(3) because State's reason for striking the venireperson, because it believed that she was sympathetic to those who were accused of and had been convicted of criminal offenses, was not implausible or fantastic.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
