LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Minnesota - August 28, 2007

  
State v. Washington, A06-932, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Steinkraus v. Cook County Bd. of Adjustment, A06-2309, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Stockwalk Group, Inc. v. Taylor, A06-1971, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Corporation's appeal from a denial of a motion to enjoin its former attorney from representing an estate against the corporation's subsidiary in an arbitration proceeding was dismissed as moot because: (1) the arbitration was concluded; and (2) there was no conflict of interest under Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7, 1.9, or 1.10(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
White Bear Twp. Dev., LLC v. Stoddard, A06-1772, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, August 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Sellers who served a buyer with a notice of cancellation of a lapsed real estate purchase agreement under Minn. Stat. § 559.21 could not be compelled to accept a closing agreement that was created unilaterally by the buyer, materially differed from the purchase agreement, and created additional risk to the sellers.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.