LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Minnesota - November 27, 2007

  
Chappelear v. Chappelear, A06-1705, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a former husband retired at 62 following a stroke, it was not error to find that he retired in good faith because the severity of his medical condition and the credibility of his physician's advice were considered; also, sufficient findings were made to support modification of spousal maintenance under Minn. Stat. §§ 518.64 and 518.552.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Chippewa Valley Bean Co. v. Green Meadow Bean Co., A06-2223, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court did not err in confirming an arbitration award, as there were no grounds to vacate it under Minn. Stat. § 572.19, subd. 1(3) because the arbitrator did not clearly exceed his power under the arbitration agreement in arbitrating the parties' dispute and the arbitrator's award drew its essence from the arbitration agreement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Collins v. State, A06-2242, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The denial of the inmate's petition for postconviction relief was proper because he did not object to the imposition of the conditional-release term at sentencing and because Blakely did not apply. The district court imposed only the term of conditional release that was part of the statutory maximum sentence for criminal-sexual conduct.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hanson v. Comm'r of Pub. Safety, A06-2102, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a driver was arrested for driving while impaired under Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, an officer's investigatory stop of his car in a parking lot was valid because the stop was justified by the location and movement of the driver's car in the parking lot of a previously burglarized facility that was closed for business.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Henderson v. Fabian, A07-0136, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The district court did not err in denying the inmate's petition for writ of habeas corpus under Minn. Stat. § 589.01; the inmate failed to establish that a prohibition on possessing pornography or a limitation on storage space affected his right to access the courts or restricted his constitutional rights.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Risk Level Determination of J.V., A06-2286, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: ALJ's order dismissing an offender's request for administrative review of his risk-level assessment under Minn. Stat. § 244.052 as moot was affirmed; because the offender was civilly committed to a residential facility and not subject to community notification, the offender lacked the requisite personal interest in the outcome of the litigation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Welfare of Child of S.B., A07-0948, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A mother's parental rights were properly terminated under Minn. Stat. § 260C.301 because the mother failed to find suitable housing, she was an illegal tenant at her daughter's townhome, she continued to have unstable moods, and she intended to move to a county where she had no connections, support system, or employment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. Elk River Area Sch. Dist., A06-2341, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Former student's sexual abuse suit against a teacher was untimely under Minn. Stat. § 541.073 because she was aware that the sexual contact with her teacher was abuse at the time the contact occurred and the six-year period was not tolled for insanity under Minn. Stat. § 541.15 based on her depression and suicidal tendencies.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Koehnen v. Titan Constr., Inc., A06-2091, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A finding that the employee was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits was proper pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 268.095, subd. 4(1), in part because she did not properly monitor the employer's finances or timely file all required tax and payroll documentation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Levar v. Zupancich Bros., A06-2348, COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA, November 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The disqualification of an employee from receiving unemployment benefits was appropriate pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 268.095, subd. 6(a) because his repeated disregard for his work schedule constituted misconduct since his behavior displayed clearly either a serious violation of the standards of behavior expected, or a lack of concern.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.