LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Mississippi - January 3, 2006

  
Lee v. State, NO. 2004-CP-00643-COA, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court affirmed the denial of the inmate's motion for post-conviction relief because, inter alia, the (1) the inmate's sentence was not excessive as it was within the statutory range for Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-1 and Miss. Code Ann. § 97-1-7, the crimes to which she pled guilty.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Little v. State, NO. 2004-CP-00602-COA, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court affirmed the denial of the inmate's motion for post-conviction relief as the inmate filed the motion more than three years after his conviction and did not assert any of the tolling provisions in Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Neshoba County Dep't of Human Servs. v. Hodge, NO. 2004-CA-00699-COA, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the foster parent's motion to intervene under Miss. R. Civ. P. 24(a) in adoption proceedings brought by the individual as it was in the best interests of the minor child for the matter to proceed without intervention.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nunn v. State, NO. 2004-KM-02170-COA, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction in violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 63-15-4(4) for failing to have motor vehicle liability insurance at the time of a traffic stop, the $1,000 fine and the suspension of his driver's license were all affirmed as there was no evidence in the record that defendant ever presented anyone with proof of insurance.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Peters v. State, NO. 2005-CP-00236-COA, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: As inmate was sentenced after June 30, 1995, and was subject to the earned-release supervision (ERS) that was present in Miss. Code Ann. § 47-5-138(5), the inmate's arguments that inmate's fifteen percent earned-time allowance should not have been spent on ERS was without merit, and his complaint was properly dismissed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pratt v. City of Greenville, NO. 2003-CA-00970-COA, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court affirmed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the city as the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction due to the firefighter's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by Miss. Code Ann. § 11-51-75.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.