 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. State, NO. 2005-KA-00520-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Indictment against defendant for attempted burglary cited burglary statute, and provided details of alleged attempted burglary and the failure to complete the burglary. Thus, indictment was sufficient under Miss. Unif. Cir. & Cty. R. 7.06 as it stated essential facts, and fully notified him of nature and cause of charges brought against him.
|
|||||
| Halderman v. State, NO. 2005-KA-00985-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant disavowed any possessory interest in a trailer, and he indicated that he lived somewhere else, he lacked standing to challenge a search; even if he had standing, a valid consent waived any right to challenge under the Fourth Amendment.
|
|||||
| Sones v. Sones Chapel Baptist Church, NO. 2005-CA-02079-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a resolution only authorized an exchange of deeds to correct an inaccurate property description, the inclusion of a reverter clause in land deeded to a church was not valid because there was no compliance with Miss. Code Ann. § 79-11-31(1).
|
|||||
| Sullivan v. Skate Zone, Inc., NO. 2005-CA-01797-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted to a property owner in a premises liability action because there was no actual or constructive notice of a toy inside of a skating rink, which ultimately caused a fall and a broken arm; moreover, the injured party was unable to show that an employee caused the toy to be there.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
