 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Smith v. State, NO. 2005-CP-01700-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for postconviction relief was properly denied where he had no entitlement to jury trial on issue of whether he qualified for enhanced punishment under habitual offender statute, Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-81; he failed to prove that an intervening decision excepted procedural time bar of his claim under Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2).
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, NO. 2005-KA-01465-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for the sale of dextropropoxyphene, a schedule IV controlled substance, in violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-139(a)(1), was proper because her duress assertion created a jury question as to whether she reasonably believed that she was under imminent threat of physical harm at the moment that she sold the medication.
|
|||||
| Sturdivant v. Todd, NO. 2005-CA-01937-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that plaintiffs proved elements of adverse possession, Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-13, was affirmed, as, inter alia, there was substantial evidence of actual and hostile possession; plaintiffs testified that they had performed such activities as mowing, clearing property of snakes, and clearing underbrush of property at issue.
|
|||||
| Windham v. Latco of Miss., Inc., NO. 2005-CA-02086-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, February 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a property damage case arising from leaky roofs on chicken houses, fraudulent concealment Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-67 did not toll the statute of repose in Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-41; therefore, summary judgment was properly granted to a builder and a manufacturer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
