Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Mississippi - February 8, 2007
	Biglane v. Under the Hill Corp., NO. 2005-CA-01751-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, February 8, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: An award of nominal damages after a finding that the property owners tortiously interfered with the saloon's business was improper because, although the property owners acted without right in blocking a parking lot, the saloon conceded that it was unable to demonstrate a loss of income from the lack of parking. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gatlin v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., NO. 2005-CA-01056-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, February 8, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Chicken grower alleged that chicken processor wrongfully terminated a contract to grow chickens; however, a jury properly returned a verdict for processor because when grower improperly disposed of chicken carcasses, grower was in breach of contract, and processor had right to terminate contract. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Kramm v. State, NO. 2005-KA-01901-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, February 8, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court erred by convicting and sentencing defendant for two counts under Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-30(1)(a) and (1)(c) because § 63-11-30 merely set forth numerous methods of committing the same crime, driving while intoxicated. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.