Mississippi, February 9, 2006, Case law by lexisONE(R)

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.

State Courts - Mississippi - February 9, 2006

Havard v. State, NO. 2003-DP-00457-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, February 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel was not violated because, inter alia, (1) a trial judge asked if any potential juror would automatically vote for or against the death penalty and, thus, counsel was not ineffective in failing to repeat that line of questioning; and (2) counsel did provide testimony in mitigation of punishment.

Search Cases for Free

Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers

Case Summary Email Service - 50% off