 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Byrd v. Bowie, NO. 2005-IA-00321-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on the issue of negligence as defendants gave no valid reasons for the failure to respond to the request for admissions, and answers deemed admitted by the failure to respond to the admissions supported the grant of the partial motion for summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Johns v. State, NO. 2003-CT-00716-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an aggravated assault case, the court erred in finding that counsel was effective, Sixth Amendment, where the failure to investigate the case prejudiced defendant; the testimony of the alibi witnesses, coupled with the fact that there was absolutely no physical evidence to convict defendant, could very well have changed the outcome of the trial.
|
|||||
| Trainer v. State, NO. 2004-CA-01955-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owner did not show that Miss. Code Ann. §§ 97-33-7 and -17 failed to provide clear and adequate definition of what was allowed and what was proscribed with regard to video game machines. Statutes described what caused video game to be illegal slot machine; there was no due process violation under U.S. Const. amend. XIV or Miss. Const. art. 3, § 14.
|
|||||
| Univ. of Miss. Med. Ctr. v. Easterling, NO. 2004-IA-02360-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reversed the denial of a medical center's motion for summary judgment because plaintiff failed to comply with the ninety-day notice requirement under Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-11(1). Judgment was entered for the medical center.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
