 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sanders v. Robertson, NO. 2006-CP-00404-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly granted insurer's motion to dismiss plaintiff's pro se negligence action against insurer and its insured where record failed to confirm that plaintiff served either defendant; plaintiff's statement alone did not satisfy Miss. R. Civ. P. 4(h). All of the mail receipts were dated after the case was dismissed by the trial judge.
|
|||||
| St. Dominic-Jackson Mem'l Hosp. v. Miss. State Dep't of Health , NO. 2006-SA-00281-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Granting to the medical center a certificate of need application to relocate was proper because the medical center demonstrated the deficiencies in its current location and its reasons for needing a new facility and also provided evidence of its long-term plans and the recommendations of firms regarding the appropriateness of the relocation.
|
|||||
| Walters v. Walters, NO. 2005-CP-01731-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The wife's appeal on a divorce action was dismissed where the appellate court lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because the chancellor's entry of judgment as to fewer than all of the claims before the court did not comply with the requirements of Miss. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
|
|||||
| White v. State, NO. 2005-KA-01737-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, April 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's constitutional right to speedy trial was not violated as 1) he did not request speedy trial; and 2) he made no assertion that delay prejudiced his trial. Also, his statutory right to speedy trial, Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-1, was not violated as delays attributable to State consisted of 268 days, which was within 270 day statutory limit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
