 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Quinn v. President Broadwater Hotel, LLC, NO. 2006-CA-00090-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury case, a trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for an additur under Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-55 where, although it was undisputed that an injured party had a physical impairment and pain and suffering due to a fall, a property owner introduced contradictory evidence as to the amount of damages.
|
|||||
| Rucker v. State, NO. 2006-CP-01295-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion for post-conviction relief was properly denied in a case where an inmate pled guilty to the sale of cocaine under Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-139(a) since his twenty-year sentence was not illegal; because he was a habitual offender, the inmate should have actually received a mandatory 30-year sentence.
|
|||||
| Strahan v. State, NO. 2005-KA-02034-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a capital murder case, defendant's motion for a new trial and/or judgment notwithstanding the verdict was properly denied because three victims testified they witnessed an assault on a victim, defendant was observed firing a gun six times at the victim, and defendant made incriminating statements about his role in the murder.
|
|||||
| Walker v. Gann, NO. 2005-CA-01747-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, May 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury case, a court properly admitted defendant's expert's testimony, Miss. R. Evid. 702, because the expert stated that he was basing his testimony and opinions on multiple pieces of evidence, including the layout of the accident scene, witness testimony, and the opinions and findings of the officer who investigated the scene.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
