 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| J & J Timber Co. v. Broome, NO. 2004-IA-01914-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, May 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding in favor of the employer in the decedent's beneficiary's wrongful death action was appropriate because, once the beneficiary discharged the employee and released him from all liability, the purely derivative vicarious liability claim against the employer became barred.
|
|||||
| Pitalo v. GPCHP-GP, Inc., NO. 2005-CA-00012-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, May 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the dismissal of an individual's medical malpractice complaint as the individual did not comply with Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-36 in that she did not send a notice of intent to sue to the medical center and doctor who were the defendants in the case.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. State, NO. 2004-KA-01512-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, May 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-65 (1985), penalty available for forcibly ravishing anyone over 14 was life if jury prescribed it in its verdict or a sentence to any term determined by trial court if jury did not return a verdict of life. Thus, statute did not prohibit the 30 year sentences for defendant's four rape convictions of 17-year-old victim.
|
|||||
| St. Dominic-Madison County Med. Ctr. v. Madison County Med. Ctr., NO. 2004-SA-01240-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, May 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancery court correctly applied a prior case and ruled that the hospital's amended application for a certificate of need was for a new hospital, not a relocation, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 41-7-191; in light of the hospital's inability to meet the standards of need for a new hospital as opposed to a relocation, there was no need for remand.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
