Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Mississippi - May 24, 2007
	Caldwell v. N. Miss. Med. Ctr., Inc., NO. 2006-CA-00630-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, May 24, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Medical malpractice suit was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim because plaintiffs did not file with their complaint either a certificate of counsel or an expert disclosure in lieu thereof as required by Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-58; strict compliance with the statute was mandatory. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Lamar v. Thomas Fowler Trucking, Inc., NO. 2004-CT-00280-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, May 24, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Following decedent's death while hauling logs, decedent's daughter could not pursue remedy via wrongful death because exclusive remedy, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-1 et seq., fell under purview of workers' compensation. Subcontractor was entitled to exclusive remedy immunity because general contractor deducted premiums from payments. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Meeks v. Miller, NO. 2005-CT-00200-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, May 24, 2007, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Doctor, who was employed by state university medical center, was entitled to summary judgment in medical malpractice suit based on immunity because he acted as state employee when he treated the patient in question; the medical center had complete control over the doctor's income and had a financial interest in his earnings. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.