 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| ERA Franchise Sys. v. Mathis, NO. 2005-IA-00350-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, June 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A chancellor erred by failing to transfer a dispute over contractual obligations to a circuit court because a former member did not bring most of the claims derivatively under Miss. Code Ann. 79-4-7.40 since he was seeking a personal recovery; moreover, the parties would have been deprived of the right to a jury trial if not transfer was obtained.
|
|||||
| Sipp v. State, NO. 2004-KP-02287-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, June 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a voluntary statement made by defendant was in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendment since defendant had asked for an attorney, it was properly used for impeachment purposes during a murder trial; moreover, the failure to provide a limiting instruction on such was not error since defendant did not make such a request.
|
|||||
| Younger v. State, NO. 2005-KA-00041-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, June 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to object to judge's admonitions to jury at time he gave them. Record was inadequate to preserve for appeal claims that circuit court failed to investigate potential juror misconduct. As defendant did not raise issue of juror misconduct at circuit court level, denial of defendant's post-trial motions were proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
