 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tolliver ex rel. Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Green v. Mladineo, NO. 2005-CA-02326-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, July 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substitution of a son as the party in a wrongful death case was improper because a patient's brother lacked standing to bring the action originally; by the time the son filed an amended complaint, the limitations period in Miss. Code Ann. § 11-7-13 had expired, and the complaint did not relate back to a nullity. Therefore, dismissal was proper.
|
|||||
| Waffle House, Inc. v. Allam, NO. 2006-WC-00840-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, July 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of workers' compensation claim was not supported by substantial evidence. Appellee contemporaneously and consistently reported injury to supervisors and doctors; she had no history of back trouble; claim was not contradicted her using personal insurance to pay for visits; and medical records corroborated time, nature, and origin of injury.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Thompson, NO. 2005-CA-02038-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, July 17, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted to an insurer, an agent, and an underwriter in a claim alleging the wrongful termination of an insurance policy because a check was properly issued to a former wife as the named insured, a former husband's name was not removed from the policy, and insurance was denied due to the condition of a roof.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
