 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allen v. AMTRAK, NO. 2005-CA-01106-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, July 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an assistant conductor sued the railroad for personal injuries pursuant to the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.S. § 51 et seq., the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a Miss. R. Civ. P. 37 dismissal due to the conductor's failure to disclose a previous back injury and workers' compensation claim.
|
|||||
| Ellis v. State, NO. 2005-KA-01460-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, July 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the State's DNA evidence, where, pursuant to Miss. R. Evid. 901(a), defendant offered no proof that the blood sample tubes were substituted, and the State did not have to call every witness who handled the blood to establish the chain of custody.
|
|||||
| Hinds County Bd. of Supervisors v. Abnie, NO. 2005-IA-00185-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, July 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a consolidation action where the plaintiffs paid a total of $ 67,450.00 in filing fees to the circuit clerk, the plaintiffs were entitled to a refund of all filing fees and administrative costs in excess of the statutorily established amounts. Miss. Code Ann. § 25-7-13(1)(a) set the total filing fee at $ 75.00 for each complaint.
|
|||||
| Miss. Bar v. Hodges, NO. 2005-BD-01917-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, July 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney pled guilty in Tennessee to consuming alcohol in violation of his monitoring agreement and was suspended for one year, he was suspended for one year in Mississippi pursuant to Miss. R. Disc. St. Bar 13, retroactive to date of Tennessee order, because the infraction did not involve an act of moral turpitude or harm Mississippi client.
|
|||||
| Moss v. Batesville Casket Co., NO. 2005-CA-00372-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, July 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly granted summary judgment on a claim against a casket company alleging warranty for a particular purpose, Miss. Code Ann. § 75-2-315, because plaintiffs had not identified any particular purpose when the casket was selected, and there was no proof that the body had been damaged in any way by the alleged problems with the casket.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
