 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Arceo v. Tolliver, NO. 2005-IA-00652-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, August 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a medical malpractice suit, trial court erred in not granting hospital's and physician's motion to dismiss because Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-36(15) (Rev. 2003) required 60-day notice of the intention to bring a medical malpractice suit, which the executrix failed to provide.
|
|||||
| Edmonds v. Edmonds , NO. 2005-CA-01270-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, August 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father sought to terminate or modify his child support obligations based on his child's incarceration for murder. Under Miss. Code Ann. § 93-5-23, trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to find child emancipated, but trial court was required to consider request for modification because of changed circumstances.
|
|||||
| Gates v. State, NO. 2005-KA-01059-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, August 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for aggravated assault in violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-7(2)(b) was appropriate because the testimony provided by the victim and another dispelled the argument in support of allowing testimony under Miss. R. Evid. 404(a)(2) to prove a character trait for violence on the part of the victim.
|
|||||
| Ill. Cent. R.R. v. Acuff, NO. 2005-CA-00388-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, August 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding against the employer, a railroad, in the employee's asbestos-related claims was appropriate because the employer voluntarily entered into a settlement procedure and the circuit court's findings that the employer was bound by that agreement were based on substantial, credible, and reasonable facts.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
