 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Roach v. State, NO. 2005-KA-00237-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, August 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of defendant's motion to suppress and his subsequent drug convictions were improper because under the circumstances, particularly where the only corroboration of the confidential informant's statement was not presented to the magistrate issuing the search warrant, probable cause did not exist for the issuance of the search warrant.
|
|||||
| Woods v. State, NO. 2005-KA-02372-COA,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI, August 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case involving Medicaid fraud, a trial court erred by giving additional instructions under Miss. Unif. Cir. & Cty. R. 3.10 after the jury began its deliberations because it was not necessary. The trial court should have not used both defendant's and the State's proposed instructions because they were confusing and impossible to follow.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
