Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Mississippi - August 31, 2006
	Cleveland v. Mann, NO. 2005-CA-00924-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, August 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In a wrongful death action under Miss. Code Ann. § 11-7-13, a motion to compel arbitration should have been granted because an arbitration agreement between a doctor and a patient fell under 9 U.S.C.S. § 2 since it had a nexus to interstate commerce, and there was no procedural unconscionability based on the patient's inability to read. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Ill. Cent. R.R. v. McDaniel, NO. 2005-CA-00389-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, August 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In a case filed under Federal Employers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.S. §§ 51-60, a release signed after an employee suffered a career-ending back injury was ineffective under 45 U.S.C.S. § 55 because it was too general and merely recited a laundry list of ailments. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	McGee v. State, NO. 2003-CT-01686-SCT, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, August 31, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Although defendant's rights under the Equal Protection Clause were violated by the State's striking of one male juror, a court of appeals erred by reversing armed robbery convictions under the plain error standard of review because there was no prejudice to the outcome of the trial since the jury was substantially gender-neutral. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.