 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bacou-Dalloz Safety, Inc. v. Hall, NO. 2005-IA-01095-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, September 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a multi-party suit filed by plaintiffs who alleged various silica-related personal injuries, the original complaint listed the incorrect agent for service of process for defendant; the documents were returned and plaintiffs made no further attempt to serve the complaint. According to Miss. R. Civ. P. 4(h), dismissal of the action was required.
|
|||||
| Flores v. Elmer, NO. 2005-IA-01130-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, September 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A medical malpractice case was not barred by the two-year statute of limitations under Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-36 because the discovery rule applied where a patient visited a physician eight different times after surgery to complain about pain and loss of function in her hand; a subsequent surgery revealed a nerve problem.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Heritage Realty, Inc. v. Estate of Boles, NO. 2005-IA-00699-SCT consolidated with NO. 2005-IA-00750-SCT consolidated with NO. 2005-IA-00909-SCT,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, September 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where administratrix was appointed in county with no evidence that decedent resided there, then the estate was transferred to decedent's county of residence and estate filed negligence suit against defendants, summary judgment should have been granted to defendants because no legitimate estate ever existed and appointment was void.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
