 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hensley v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., No. 27094,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 4, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Home owner's award, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 375.420, against an insurer for vexatious refusal to pay was supported by the evidence because no grounds were given as to why the insurer refused to pay, and the insurer took no action to investigate the owner's alibi on the morning of the fire although it was aware of witnesses who could corroborate the alibi.
|
|||||
| Harp v. State, No. 27593,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Post-conviction relief under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 29.15 based on ineffective assistance of counsel was denied because a motion to dismiss or a challenge to the jury instructions given in a drug case would have been meritless since there was no violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 556.041(1), (4) or the constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy.
|
|||||
| Nelson v. State, No. 27693,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 5, 2007 Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal of the denial of postconviction relief was dismissed pursuant to the escape rule where the 31-month delay in sentencing due to appellant's willful failure to appear adversely affected the criminal justice system. Permitting appellant to pursue an appeal after an escape would tend to diminish respect for the criminal justice system.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
