|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Missouri - January 17, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Allen v. Scott, Hewitt and Mize, L.L.C. , WD 64939,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In sellers' suit against the buyer and his company to rescind the sale of land due to their mistake when the company listed the land for 10 times the sale price, summary judgment against the sellers was proper as the company was not a party to the contract, and the fact that the company was not organized at the time of the contract was irrelevant.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Charnisky v. Chrismer, No. ED85933,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In challenge to annexation election, pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 71.015.3 (2000), second contestant of election did not have standing on appeal to challenge portion of judgment granting first contestant relief because he was not aggrieved; also, substantial evidence supported trial court's finding that second contestant failed to vote properly.
|
|
| |
Clinch v. Heartland Health , WD 64853,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In surgeon's claims of tortious interference and restraint of trade against another surgeon, medical center, former employer, and corporate officer, summary judgment on tortious interference was proper because plaintiff was required to show improper means; also, plaintiff lacked standing for antitrust claim.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
