 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kan. City, Inc., WD 66679,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given the failure of a pro se claimant, who was challenging a decision regarding his ineligibility for unemployment benefits, to substantially comply with Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 84.04's briefing requirements, the appellate court was compelled to dismiss his appeal since the court could not conduct a review of his case without becoming an advocate for him.
|
|||||
| Brown v. State, No. ED86981,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Calcara v. PPG Indus., WD66954,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a workers' compensation matter, Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission erroneously dismissed, pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.610.6, a company's application for review of an award to the worker as untimely because the application was timely filed within 20 days after award.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Schmidt, WD 65517 (Consolidated No. WD 66039),
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution/child custody proceeding, the trial court's custody award and parenting plan were both reversed because the trial court failed to make the written findings required under Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 452.375 and 452.310, respectively, which were necessary for appellate review of the orders.
|
|||||
| Desselle v. Complete Home Concepts, Inc., WD 66329,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New trial was not warranted where a judgment was entered for a fireplace installer in a negligence action because the judgment did not have to be supported by any evidence; expert testimony offered by homeowners regarding installation failures and a manufacturer's instructions were not conclusive as to whether the installer's actions caused a fire.
|
|||||
| Dreppard v. Dreppard, No. ED88587,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's appeal of trial court's denial of his motion to disqualify a GAL was dismissed as certification under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 74.01(b) was improper; court's judgment failed to resolve a distinct judicial unit as judgment in question did not finally dispose of even one claim in the modification proceeding, but was a ruling on an ancillary issue.
|
|||||
| Dressel v. Dressel, No. ED87312,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was dismissed because a claimant's brief failed to comply with the requirements of Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 84.04, when the argument portion of the claimant's brief was devoid of any reference to the record on appeal, and the appellate court was unable to decipher the claimant's statement of facts to determine the pertinent facts of the appeal.
|
|||||
| Fritz v. Jackson County, WD 66834,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 9, 2007, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Garas v. Kelly Servs., No. ED88333,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission erred in finding claimant disqualified from unemployment benefits under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.050.1(3) on ground that she failed to accept suitable work offered by former employer where there was not offer of work made by staffing agency, but only offer to submit her resume for potential assignment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
