 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Davis v. State, No. ED87866,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Garr v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. and Parole, WD 66466,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Declaratory judgment in favor of respondent on his petition for a writ of mandamus seeking a declaration that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole had improperly calculated his mandatory minimum prison term was reversed and remanded because there were issues of fact that precluded judgment on the pleadings.
|
|||||
| Gholson v. Dir. of Revenue, WD 64901,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in overturning the director of revenue's revocation of a driver's driving license as the fact that the testing officer did not observe the driver for the requisite 15-minute period under Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 19, § 25-30.060 was not sufficient alone to rebut the director's prima facie case under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 302.505.1.
|
|||||
| Hammer v. State, WD 65851,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Holmes v. Bi-State Dev. Agency, No. ED87920,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ivory v. State, WD 65867,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, January 16, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant entered a guilty plea of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver; appellant sought post-conviction relief pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 24.035. Trial court erred in denying motion because it failed to make adequate findings about State's sentencing cap promise that was allegedly breached, which would render guilty plea involuntary.
|
|||||
| Jones v. St. Louis Lead Prevention Coalition, No. ED88984,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant's appeal of an order denying her claim for unemployment benefits was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction where her application for review to the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission was untimely under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.200.1. Without a timely application for review, the Commission had no jurisdiction over claimant's case.
|
|||||
| Kibby v. State, No. ED87892,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Knisley v. Charleswood Corp., No. ED87605,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission erred in denying an employee's claim for Second Injury Fund benefits under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.220.1 because, inter alia, she was not required to distinguish among and assign percentages to each of her pre-existing disabilities and her pre-existing conditions were an obstacle to her employment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
