 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bledsoe Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Eldorado Springs R-II Sch. Dist., No. 26758,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment granting former employees the difference between wages they were paid by employer and the wages to which they were actually entitled pursuant to the Missouri Prevailing Wage Act, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 290.210 et seq. (2000), was affirmed as to two employees but reversed as to two others regarding whom the facts were not undisputed.
|
|||||
| State v. Ebeirus, No. 26823,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a forgery case where defendant failed to move to strike for cause two jurors who indicated an expectation that defendant would testify, the trial court did not plainly err under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 30.20 by not sua sponte removing the jurors as the possibility of prejudice evaporated when defendant presented his brother to testify on his behalf.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
