 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Denson v. St. Charles County, No. ED86392,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Flores v. State, WD64441,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 7, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Foster v. State, WD 64719,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 7, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hunter v. State, No. ED85624,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lake Tapawingo Dev. Co. v. Beth, WD 64664,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 7, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Maclin v. State, No. 26867,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion court did not err in denying inmate's motion for post-conviction relief, Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 29.15, as failure to call potential witness did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel as witness's testimony would not have provided him with viable defense to robbery charge or unqualifiedly supported his theory of defense or trial testimony.
|
|||||
| Miller v. Help at Home, Inc., WD 64918,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 7, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant was properly disqualified, under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.050, from receiving unemployment compensation benefits; court failed to see how reasonable person would have felt compelled to quit job over reduction in hours for only two weeks with no reduction in rate of pay, no prospects of employment, and opportunity to look for other employment.
|
|||||
| Nu-Art Series v. Creative Co., No. ED85524,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Owsley v. Brittain, WD64812,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 7, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding against a mother was improper in part pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 452.340.5 because the appellate court could not conclude that the father's receipt of the required documentation one day after the semester started was beyond a reasonable interpretation and application of the phrase "in the beginning of each semester."
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
