 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Miller v. Dunn, No. ED86297,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services' decision ordering a nurse's name to be permanently placed on the Employee Disqualification List for misappropriating a check was supported by competent and substantial evidence where she actively obtained the check from an elderly nursing home resident with questionable mental condition.
|
|||||
| Public Sch. Ret. Sys. v. Mo. Comm'n on Human Rights , WD 65106,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 14, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In age discrimination suit, trial court did not err in issuing a summary judgment for the Missouri Commission on Human Rights (MCHR) after it issued a right to sue letter, in accordance with Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.111.1, for employee against school retirement system because notice was not improperly given more than 180 days after complaint's filing.
|
|||||
| Reed v. Dir. of Revenue, No. SC87082,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in reinstating driver's driving privileges as he was arrested in violation of Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.039; he was arrested without a warrant more than one and one half hours after violation and he did not leave the scene of an "accident" within the meaning of the statute because he caused no personal injury or property damage.
|
|||||
| Ronnoco Coffee Co. v. Dir. of Revenue, No. SC86724, No. SC86725, No. SC86912,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Coffee companies' "loans" of coffee equipment to their customers, with an extra charge for coffee and tea purchases, were not lease transactions subject to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 144.020.1(8) (2000), but were instead tax exempt resales and the companies were thus entitled to the use tax resale exemption under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 144.615(6) (2000).
|
|||||
| State v. Parker, WD 65145,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 14, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Robinson, No. ED86057,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Rowlette, WD 65022,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 14, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stehno v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., No. SC87023,
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Individual was not entitled to a new trial on his claim for interference with a business expectancy; the individual did not establish that he had a reasonable expectation to secure permanent employment with a contractor for whom he was working when the business, a contractor's client, expressed concerns about the employee working on its project.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. State, No. ED85953,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
