 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Breeden v. Hogan Transps., Inc., No. ED85731,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 21, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Breeden v. Hogan Transps., Inc., No. ED85731,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chebaro v. Lodigensky, WD 64492 (consolidated with WD 64493 and WD 64517),
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 21, 2006, Decided , February 21, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| D.K.S. v. S.S., WD 65526 and WD 65564,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 21, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because at least one statutory ground supporting termination of parental rights was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, the court affirmed the judgment, citing Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 84.16(b).
|
|||||
| Erbland v. State, No. ED86262,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Farrell v. St. Louis County, No. ED86646,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the facts alleged in inmate's petition failed to establish a dangerous condition of a county's property, the inmate failed to state a claim for relief under the dangerous condition exception to sovereign immunity, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 537.600 (2000), and accordingly, the trial court did not err in dismissing his cause of action with prejudice.
|
|||||
| Faurot v. Dir. of Revenue, WD 64780,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 21, 2006, Decided , February 21, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Foster v. State, No. ED86607,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 21, 2006, Order Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ghattas v. Amini, WD 65417,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, February 21, 2006, Decided , February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
