 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fewell v. Greene County Juvenile Office (In the Interest of T.L.F.), No. 26829,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of appellant's petition for transfer of custody of a child for adoption was proper where the trial court did not err in not combining for hearing both petitions seeking transfer of custody and adoption of the child because to do so was within the circuit court's discretion. Further, appellant did not request consolidation.
|
|||||
| Juvenile Officer v. I.A. (In the Interest of M.A.), WD 65819,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, WESTERN DISTRICT, March 3, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of parental rights case was remanded to the juvenile court where the juvenile court's findings were insufficient to determine whether it properly considered the alternative basis pleaded for termination of the mother's parental rights, i.e., abuse and neglect, under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 211.447.
|
|||||
| Smart Cemetery v. Bell Holdings, L.L.C., No. 26927,
COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, March 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment sustaining a developer's motion to enforce a settlement agreement with a cemetery board regarding the development of land adjacent to the cemetery was affirmed where the cemetery waived a statute of frauds defense by not raising it in the pleadings or at the hearing on the developer's motion, and agreement satisfied statute in any event.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
