LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Missouri - February 22 - February 26, 2007

  
Berry v. State, No. 27698, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: After defendant pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and second degree assault, denial of defendant's Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel was proper as he waived all non-jurisdictional defects, defenses, and errors, when he entered a knowing and voluntary plea.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Edwards v. State, No. 27652, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Movant for post-conviction relief maintained that sentencing court erred in sentencing outside the range of punishment and denying his right to a fair trial; however, movant was not entitled to any benefit from a change in the law because change to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 558.011 occurred after movant's original sentencing date.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Paulson, No. 27633, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of statutory rape and statutory sodomy, Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 566.032.1, 566.062.1, because, inter alia, (1) he stuck his sexual organ inside her privates; (2) he put his sexual organ inside her behind; (3) he made her rub his sexual organ until he ejaculated; and (4) he made her suck on his sexual organ.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Tabor, No. 27271, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a statutory rape case, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 566.032, the court's admission of a paternity test was harmless error because it was cumulative to properly admitted evidence including the victim's testimony and defendant's admissions that showed that defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim when she was less than fourteen years old.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Wright, No. 27430, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a sodomy case, plain error under Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 30.20 was not shown by a trial court's failure to act sua sponte and grant a mistrial where an investigator commented on the credibility of a victim because the response was brief, there was no elaboration, the jury was instructed of its role, and an objection and ruling were made before the jury.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dixon v. Stoam Indus., No. 27407, COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSOURI, SOUTHERN DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Pursuant to Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.030.1(24), the employee's refusal to comply with a lawful and reasonable directive from his supervisor constituted misconduct, and the employee knew or should have known that the supervisor was his supervisor; thus, the employee was disqualified for waiting-week credit and benefits, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 288.050.2.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.